1990 Dodge Colt vs. 1998 Mazda 323
To start off, 1998 Mazda 323 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Dodge Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Dodge Colt would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Mazda 323 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Dodge Colt (96 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1998 Mazda 323. (71 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Dodge Colt should accelerate faster than 1998 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Dodge Colt weights approximately 90 kg more than 1998 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Dodge Colt (153 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Mazda 323. (130 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1990 Dodge Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Dodge Colt | 1998 Mazda 323 | |
| Make | Dodge | Mazda |
| Model | Colt | 323 |
| Year Released | 1990 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 71 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 153 Nm | 130 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1105 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2620 mm |
