1990 Dodge Colt vs. 2000 Ford TL-50
To start off, 2000 Ford TL-50 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Dodge Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Dodge Colt would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Dodge Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford TL-50 (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1990 Dodge Colt. (96 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford TL-50 should accelerate faster than 1990 Dodge Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford TL-50 weights approximately 107 kg more than 1990 Dodge Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Ford TL-50 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford TL-50. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Dodge Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford TL-50 (570 Nm) has 417 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Dodge Colt. (153 Nm). This means 2000 Ford TL-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Dodge Colt.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Dodge Colt | 2000 Ford TL-50 | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | Colt | TL-50 |
Year Released | 1990 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1798 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 153 Nm | 570 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1302 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2760 mm |