1990 Dodge Colt vs. 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR
To start off, 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Dodge Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Dodge Colt would be higher. At 4,998 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Dodge Colt weights approximately 195 kg more than 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR.
Because 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Dodge Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Dodge Colt | 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR | |
| Make | Dodge | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Colt | CLK GTR |
| Year Released | 1990 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 4998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1960 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1110 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2680 mm |
