1990 Dodge Colt vs. 2003 MG ZR
To start off, 2003 MG ZR is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Dodge Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Dodge Colt would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Dodge Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MG ZR (158 HP @ 6900 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1990 Dodge Colt. (96 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 MG ZR should accelerate faster than 1990 Dodge Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Dodge Colt weights approximately 75 kg more than 2003 MG ZR.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 MG ZR (174 Nm @ 4700 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Dodge Colt. (153 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2003 MG ZR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Dodge Colt.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Dodge Colt | 2003 MG ZR | |
Make | Dodge | MG |
Model | Colt | ZR |
Year Released | 1990 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6900 RPM |
Torque | 153 Nm | 174 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1120 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4020 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2510 mm |