1990 Dodge Colt vs. 2003 Subaru R2
To start off, 2003 Subaru R2 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Dodge Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Dodge Colt would be higher. At 1,468 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Dodge Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Dodge Colt (81 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 2003 Subaru R2. (44 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Dodge Colt should accelerate faster than 2003 Subaru R2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Dodge Colt weights approximately 225 kg more than 2003 Subaru R2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Dodge Colt (123 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Subaru R2. (58 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 1990 Dodge Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Subaru R2.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Dodge Colt | 2003 Subaru R2 | |
Make | Dodge | Subaru |
Model | Colt | R2 |
Year Released | 1990 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1468 cc | 657 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 44 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 123 Nm | 58 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2370 mm |