1990 Dodge Colt vs. 2004 Mazda 6
To start off, 2004 Mazda 6 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Dodge Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Dodge Colt would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda 6 (144 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1990 Dodge Colt. (96 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1990 Dodge Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 6 weights approximately 215 kg more than 1990 Dodge Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda 6 (181 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Dodge Colt. (153 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2004 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Dodge Colt.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Dodge Colt | 2004 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Dodge | Mazda |
Model | Colt | 6 |
Year Released | 1990 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 144 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 153 Nm | 181 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2610 mm |