1990 Dodge Colt vs. 2004 Oldsmobile Alero
To start off, 2004 Oldsmobile Alero is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Dodge Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Dodge Colt would be higher. At 3,343 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Oldsmobile Alero is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Oldsmobile Alero (170 HP) has 89 more horse power than 1990 Dodge Colt. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Oldsmobile Alero should accelerate faster than 1990 Dodge Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Oldsmobile Alero weights approximately 422 kg more than 1990 Dodge Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Oldsmobile Alero (271 Nm) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Dodge Colt. (123 Nm). This means 2004 Oldsmobile Alero will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Dodge Colt.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Dodge Colt | 2004 Oldsmobile Alero | |
| Make | Dodge | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Colt | Alero |
| Year Released | 1990 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1468 cc | 3343 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 170 HP |
| Torque | 123 Nm | 271 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 1417 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4750 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2720 mm |
