1990 Dodge Colt vs. 2006 Subaru Forester
To start off, 2006 Subaru Forester is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Dodge Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Dodge Colt would be higher. At 2,457 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Subaru Forester is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Subaru Forester (163 HP) has 67 more horse power than 1990 Dodge Colt. (96 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Subaru Forester should accelerate faster than 1990 Dodge Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Subaru Forester weights approximately 438 kg more than 1990 Dodge Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Subaru Forester is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1990 Dodge Colt. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Subaru Forester will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Subaru Forester (225 Nm) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Dodge Colt. (153 Nm). This means 2006 Subaru Forester will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Dodge Colt.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Dodge Colt | 2006 Subaru Forester | |
Make | Dodge | Subaru |
Model | Colt | Forester |
Year Released | 1990 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 2457 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 163 HP |
Torque | 153 Nm | 225 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1633 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2530 mm |