1990 Dodge Colt vs. 2006 Suzuki Reno
To start off, 2006 Suzuki Reno is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Dodge Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Dodge Colt would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Suzuki Reno is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Suzuki Reno (126 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1990 Dodge Colt. (96 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Suzuki Reno should accelerate faster than 1990 Dodge Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Dodge Colt weights approximately 130 kg more than 2006 Suzuki Reno.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Suzuki Reno (178 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Dodge Colt. (153 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Suzuki Reno will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Dodge Colt.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Dodge Colt | 2006 Suzuki Reno | |
Make | Dodge | Suzuki |
Model | Colt | Reno |
Year Released | 1990 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 126 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 153 Nm | 178 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1065 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2610 mm |