1990 Dodge Colt vs. 2008 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2008 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Dodge Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Dodge Colt would be higher. At 3,726 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda CX-9 (271 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 175 more horse power than 1990 Dodge Colt. (96 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1990 Dodge Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 134 kg more than 1990 Dodge Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda CX-9 (370 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 217 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Dodge Colt. (153 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2008 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Dodge Colt.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Dodge Colt | 2008 Mazda CX-9 | |
| Make | Dodge | Mazda |
| Model | Colt | CX-9 |
| Year Released | 1990 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 3726 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 271 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Torque | 153 Nm | 370 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1329 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 5080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1940 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2880 mm |
