1990 Dodge Colt vs. 2010 Suzuki Swift
To start off, 2010 Suzuki Swift is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Dodge Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Dodge Colt would be higher. At 1,468 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Dodge Colt is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2010 Suzuki Swift is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1990 Dodge Colt. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Suzuki Swift will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Dodge Colt | 2010 Suzuki Swift | |
| Make | Dodge | Suzuki |
| Model | Colt | Swift |
| Year Released | 1990 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1468 cc | 1400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 3850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1695 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2430 mm |
