1990 Dodge Colt vs. 2012 Ford C-Max
To start off, 2012 Ford C-Max is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Dodge Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Dodge Colt would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Dodge Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford C-Max (105 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1990 Dodge Colt. (96 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford C-Max should accelerate faster than 1990 Dodge Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford C-Max weights approximately 180 kg more than 1990 Dodge Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Dodge Colt (153 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Ford C-Max. (150 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1990 Dodge Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Ford C-Max.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Dodge Colt | 2012 Ford C-Max | |
| Make | Dodge | Ford |
| Model | Colt | C-Max |
| Year Released | 1990 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1596 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 105 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 153 Nm | 150 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1375 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4380 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1828 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1626 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2648 mm |
