1990 Dodge Colt vs. 2012 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2012 Holden Commodore is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Dodge Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Dodge Colt would be higher. At 2,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Commodore (240 HP) has 159 more horse power than 1990 Dodge Colt. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1990 Dodge Colt.
Because 2012 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Dodge Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Commodore (240 Nm) has 117 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Dodge Colt. (123 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Dodge Colt.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Dodge Colt | 2012 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Dodge | Holden |
Model | Colt | Commodore |
Year Released | 1990 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1468 cc | 2564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 240 HP |
Torque | 123 Nm | 240 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |