1990 Eagle Summit vs. 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1990 Eagle Summit is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,344 cc (6 cylinders), 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass (160 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1990 Eagle Summit. (81 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 1990 Eagle Summit.
Because 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Eagle Summit, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass (251 Nm) has 128 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Eagle Summit. (123 Nm). This means 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Eagle Summit.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Eagle Summit | 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Eagle | Oldsmobile |
Model | Summit | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1990 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1468 cc | 3344 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 123 Nm | 251 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 4840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2670 mm |