1990 Eagle Talon vs. 1986 Rolls-Royce Corniche
To start off, 1990 Eagle Talon is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Rolls-Royce Corniche. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Rolls-Royce Corniche would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1986 Rolls-Royce Corniche is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Rolls-Royce Corniche weights approximately 1050 kg more than 1990 Eagle Talon.
Because 1986 Rolls-Royce Corniche is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Rolls-Royce Corniche. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Eagle Talon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Eagle Talon | 1986 Rolls-Royce Corniche | |
Make | Eagle | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Talon | Corniche |
Year Released | 1990 | 1986 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 6750 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 2280 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 5200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 3030 mm |