1990 Fiat Tempra vs. 2002 Renault Clio
To start off, 2002 Renault Clio is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Fiat Tempra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Fiat Tempra would be higher. At 1,756 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Fiat Tempra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Fiat Tempra (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2002 Renault Clio. (78 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Fiat Tempra should accelerate faster than 2002 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Fiat Tempra weights approximately 149 kg more than 2002 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Renault Clio (185 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Fiat Tempra. (140 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2002 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Fiat Tempra.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Fiat Tempra | 2002 Renault Clio | |
Make | Fiat | Renault |
Model | Tempra | Clio |
Year Released | 1990 | 2002 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1756 cc | 1461 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 78 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 140 Nm | 185 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.2 mm | 80.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 18.8:1 |
Top Speed | 196 km/hour | 175 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 10.9 seconds | 12.2 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1133 kg | 984 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.6 L/100km | 4.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 50 L |