1990 Fiat Tempra vs. 2008 Renault Clio
To start off, 2008 Renault Clio is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Fiat Tempra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Fiat Tempra would be higher. At 2,946 cc, 2008 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Renault Clio weights approximately 303 kg more than 1990 Fiat Tempra.
Because 2008 Renault Clio is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Renault Clio. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Fiat Tempra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Renault Clio (301 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 192 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Fiat Tempra. (109 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2008 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Fiat Tempra.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Fiat Tempra | 2008 Renault Clio | |
Make | Fiat | Renault |
Model | Tempra | Clio |
Year Released | 1990 | 2008 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1372 cc | 2946 cc |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 109 Nm | 301 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80.5 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 67.4 mm | 82.6 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1032 kg | 1335 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2520 mm |