1990 Fiat Tempra vs. 2010 Renault Clio
To start off, 2010 Renault Clio is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Fiat Tempra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Fiat Tempra would be higher. At 1,756 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Fiat Tempra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Fiat Tempra (110 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 2010 Renault Clio. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Fiat Tempra should accelerate faster than 2010 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Fiat Tempra (140 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Renault Clio. (94 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1990 Fiat Tempra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Fiat Tempra | 2010 Renault Clio | |
Make | Fiat | Renault |
Model | Tempra | Clio |
Year Released | 1990 | 2010 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1756 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 140 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 69 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.2 mm | 76.8 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2480 mm |