1990 Fiat Tempra vs. 2011 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2011 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Fiat Tempra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Fiat Tempra would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Citroen C-Crosser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Citroen C-Crosser (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1990 Fiat Tempra. (86 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 1990 Fiat Tempra.
Because 2011 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1990 Fiat Tempra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Citroen C-Crosser (232 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Fiat Tempra. (130 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2011 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Fiat Tempra.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Fiat Tempra | 2011 Citroen C-Crosser | |
Make | Fiat | Citroen |
Model | Tempra | C-Crosser |
Year Released | 1990 | 2011 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1581 cc | 2359 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 130 Nm | 232 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86.4 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 67.5 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |