1990 Fiat Uno vs. 1965 Ford Zodiac
To start off, 1990 Fiat Uno is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Zodiac would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Ford Zodiac is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Ford Zodiac (108 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1990 Fiat Uno. (71 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Ford Zodiac should accelerate faster than 1990 Fiat Uno. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Ford Zodiac weights approximately 440 kg more than 1990 Fiat Uno. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Ford Zodiac is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Ford Zodiac. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Fiat Uno, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1965 Ford Zodiac (190 Nm @ 2900 RPM) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Fiat Uno. (108 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 1965 Ford Zodiac will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Fiat Uno.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Fiat Uno | 1965 Ford Zodiac | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | Uno | Zodiac |
Year Released | 1990 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1372 cc | 2553 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 71 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Torque | 108 Nm | 190 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80.5 mm | 82.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 67.4 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 8.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 830 kg | 1270 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2780 mm |