1990 Fiat Uno vs. 1968 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 1990 Fiat Uno is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 1,498 cc, 1968 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Mitsubishi Colt (72 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1990 Fiat Uno. (44 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 1990 Fiat Uno. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 155 kg more than 1990 Fiat Uno. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Mitsubishi Colt (120 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Fiat Uno. (79 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 1968 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Fiat Uno.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Fiat Uno | 1968 Mitsubishi Colt | |
| Make | Fiat | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Uno | Colt |
| Year Released | 1990 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 999 cc | 1498 cc |
| Horse Power | 44 HP | 72 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 79 Nm | 120 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 755 kg | 910 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2360 mm |
