1990 Ford Aerostar vs. 1952 Jaguar C-Type
To start off, 1990 Ford Aerostar is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar C-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar C-Type would be higher. At 3,973 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Ford Aerostar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Jaguar C-Type (218 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1990 Ford Aerostar. (154 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1952 Jaguar C-Type should accelerate faster than 1990 Ford Aerostar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Ford Aerostar weights approximately 400 kg more than 1952 Jaguar C-Type.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Jaguar C-Type (330 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Ford Aerostar. (298 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1952 Jaguar C-Type will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Ford Aerostar.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Ford Aerostar | 1952 Jaguar C-Type | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | Aerostar | C-Type |
Year Released | 1990 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3973 cc | 3442 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 218 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 298 Nm | 330 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1415 kg | 1015 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2450 mm |