1990 Ford Aerostar vs. 1965 Seat 600
To start off, 1990 Ford Aerostar is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Seat 600 would be higher. At 2,977 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Ford Aerostar is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Ford Aerostar weights approximately 835 kg more than 1965 Seat 600.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Ford Aerostar (224 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 177 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Seat 600. (47 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1990 Ford Aerostar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Ford Aerostar | 1965 Seat 600 | |
Make | Ford | Seat |
Model | Aerostar | 600 |
Year Released | 1990 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2977 cc | 767 cc |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 224 Nm | 47 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2010 mm |