1990 Ford Aerostar vs. 1982 Mazda 929
To start off, 1990 Ford Aerostar is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 3,973 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Ford Aerostar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Ford Aerostar (154 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1982 Mazda 929. (100 HP @ 5900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Ford Aerostar should accelerate faster than 1982 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Ford Aerostar weights approximately 255 kg more than 1982 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Ford Aerostar | 1982 Mazda 929 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Aerostar | 929 |
| Year Released | 1990 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3973 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 154 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1415 kg | 1160 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2620 mm |
