1990 Ford Aerostar vs. 1995 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 1995 Mazda RX-7 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Ford Aerostar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Ford Aerostar would be higher. At 2,977 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Ford Aerostar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mazda RX-7 (238 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1990 Ford Aerostar. (143 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 1990 Ford Aerostar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Ford Aerostar weights approximately 110 kg more than 1995 Mazda RX-7.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Mazda RX-7 (296 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Ford Aerostar. (224 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1995 Mazda RX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Ford Aerostar.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Ford Aerostar | 1995 Mazda RX-7 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Aerostar | RX-7 |
Year Released | 1990 | 1995 |
Body Type | Minivan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2977 cc | 2616 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 238 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 224 Nm | 296 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1240 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2430 mm |