1990 Ford Aerostar vs. 1996 Volkswagen Golf
To start off, 1996 Volkswagen Golf is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Ford Aerostar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Ford Aerostar would be higher. At 2,977 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Ford Aerostar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Ford Aerostar (143 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1996 Volkswagen Golf. (115 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Ford Aerostar should accelerate faster than 1996 Volkswagen Golf.
Because 1990 Ford Aerostar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 Ford Aerostar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Volkswagen Golf, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Ford Aerostar (224 Nm) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Volkswagen Golf. (165 Nm). This means 1990 Ford Aerostar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Volkswagen Golf.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Ford Aerostar | 1996 Volkswagen Golf | |
Make | Ford | Volkswagen |
Model | Aerostar | Golf |
Year Released | 1990 | 1996 |
Body Type | Minivan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2977 cc | 1896 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 115 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 224 Nm | 165 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 82.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78.7 mm | 92.7 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2480 mm |