1990 Ford Aerostar vs. 2003 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2003 Ford Ecosport is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Ford Aerostar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Ford Aerostar would be higher. At 3,973 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Ford Aerostar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Ford Aerostar (154 HP) has 11 more horse power than 2003 Ford Ecosport. (143 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Ford Aerostar should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1990 Ford Aerostar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 Ford Aerostar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Ford Aerostar | 2003 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Aerostar | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1990 | 2003 |
Body Type | Minivan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3973 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 143 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2490 mm |