1990 Ford Corsair vs. 1966 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1990 Ford Corsair is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Ford Corsair (111 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1966 Triumph 2000. (91 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Ford Corsair should accelerate faster than 1966 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 40 kg more than 1990 Ford Corsair.
Let's talk about torque, 1990 Ford Corsair (168 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1990 Ford Corsair will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Ford Corsair | 1966 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Ford | Triumph |
| Model | Corsair | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1990 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1974 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 111 HP | 91 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 168 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 74.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 76 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1130 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2700 mm |
