1990 Ford Falcon vs. 2001 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2001 Toyota Condor is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,157 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Ford Falcon (120 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 2001 Toyota Condor. (96 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2001 Toyota Condor. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Toyota Condor weights approximately 6 kg more than 1990 Ford Falcon.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Ford Falcon (235 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Toyota Condor. (158 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1990 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Toyota Condor.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Ford Falcon | 2001 Toyota Condor | |
| Make | Ford | Toyota |
| Model | Falcon | Condor |
| Year Released | 1990 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3157 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 96 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 235 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1420 kg | 1426 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2540 mm |
