1990 Ford Falcon vs. 2002 Mazda 6

To start off, 2002 Mazda 6 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,157 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Ford Falcon (120 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2002 Mazda 6. (119 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2002 Mazda 6.

Because 1990 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Ford Falcon (235 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mazda 6. (168 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1990 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mazda 6.

Compare all specifications:

1990 Ford Falcon 2002 Mazda 6
Make Ford Mazda
Model Falcon 6
Year Released 1990 2002
Body Type Sedan Station Wagon
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3157 cc 1840 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 120 HP 119 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 5700 RPM
Torque 235 Nm 168 Nm
Torque RPM 3250 RPM 4500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1420 kg 1420 kg
Vehicle Length 4820 mm 4680 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1790 mm
Vehicle Height 1410 mm 1440 mm
Wheelbase Size 2800 mm 2680 mm