1990 Ford Falcon vs. 2004 Mitsubishi L 200

To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi L 200 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,157 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Ford Falcon (120 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2004 Mitsubishi L 200. (110 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2004 Mitsubishi L 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mitsubishi L 200 weights approximately 300 kg more than 1990 Ford Falcon.

Because 2004 Mitsubishi L 200 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1990 Ford Falcon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi L 200 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mitsubishi L 200 (240 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Ford Falcon. (235 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2004 Mitsubishi L 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Ford Falcon.

Compare all specifications:

1990 Ford Falcon 2004 Mitsubishi L 200
Make Ford Mitsubishi
Model Falcon L 200
Year Released 1990 2004
Body Type Sedan Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3157 cc 2350 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 120 HP 110 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 235 Nm 240 Nm
Torque RPM 3250 RPM 2000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1420 kg 1720 kg
Vehicle Length 4820 mm 5060 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1710 mm
Vehicle Height 1410 mm 1790 mm
Wheelbase Size 2800 mm 2970 mm