1990 Ford Falcon vs. 2004 Subaru Forester
To start off, 2004 Subaru Forester is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,157 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Subaru Forester (162 HP) has 42 more horse power than 1990 Ford Falcon. (120 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Subaru Forester should accelerate faster than 1990 Ford Falcon.
Because 2004 Subaru Forester is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1990 Ford Falcon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Subaru Forester will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Ford Falcon (235 Nm) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Subaru Forester. (225 Nm). This means 1990 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Subaru Forester.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Ford Falcon | 2004 Subaru Forester | |
Make | Ford | Subaru |
Model | Falcon | Forester |
Year Released | 1990 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3157 cc | 2458 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 162 HP |
Torque | 235 Nm | 225 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1420 kg | 1420 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2530 mm |