1990 Ford Falcon vs. 2010 Scion tC
To start off, 2010 Scion tC is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,157 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Scion tC (161 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1990 Ford Falcon. (120 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Scion tC should accelerate faster than 1990 Ford Falcon.
Because 1990 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Scion tC, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Ford Falcon (235 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Scion tC. (219 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1990 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Scion tC.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Ford Falcon | 2010 Scion tC | |
Make | Ford | Scion |
Model | Falcon | tC |
Year Released | 1990 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3157 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 161 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 235 Nm | 219 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1415 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2700 mm |