1990 Ford Granada vs. 2001 Mazda CU-X
To start off, 2001 Mazda CU-X is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Ford Granada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Ford Granada would be higher. At 2,933 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Ford Granada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Ford Granada (150 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Ford Granada should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda CU-X. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mazda CU-X weights approximately 5 kg more than 1990 Ford Granada.
Because 1990 Ford Granada is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 Ford Granada. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mazda CU-X, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mazda CU-X (240 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Ford Granada. (233 Nm). This means 2001 Mazda CU-X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Ford Granada.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Ford Granada | 2001 Mazda CU-X | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Granada | CU-X |
Year Released | 1990 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2933 cc | 1970 cc |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 233 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1340 kg | 1345 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2680 mm |