1990 Ford Mustang vs. 1955 Pontiac Star Chief
To start off, 1990 Ford Mustang is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Pontiac Star Chief. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Pontiac Star Chief would be higher. At 4,715 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Pontiac Star Chief is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Pontiac Star Chief (173 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 1990 Ford Mustang. (89 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1955 Pontiac Star Chief should accelerate faster than 1990 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Pontiac Star Chief weights approximately 406 kg more than 1990 Ford Mustang. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Ford Mustang | 1955 Pontiac Star Chief | |
Make | Ford | Pontiac |
Model | Mustang | Star Chief |
Year Released | 1990 | 1955 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2301 cc | 4715 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 173 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1656 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 5160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 3110 mm |