1990 Ford Mustang vs. 1957 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 1990 Ford Mustang is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 2,301 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Ford Mustang (89 HP) has 49 more horse power than 1957 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1957 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Ford Mustang weights approximately 40 kg more than 1957 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Ford Mustang | 1957 Toyota Master RR | |
| Make | Ford | Toyota |
| Model | Mustang | Master RR |
| Year Released | 1990 | 1957 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2301 cc | 1453 cc |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 40 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2540 mm |
