1990 Ford Mustang vs. 1986 Renault 9
To start off, 1990 Ford Mustang is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Renault 9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Renault 9 would be higher. At 2,301 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Ford Mustang (105 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1986 Renault 9. (47 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1986 Renault 9. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Ford Mustang weights approximately 440 kg more than 1986 Renault 9. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Ford Mustang | 1986 Renault 9 | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Mustang | 9 |
Year Released | 1990 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2301 cc | 1108 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 70 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.2:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 38 L |