1990 Ford Ranger vs. 1950 Triumph Roadster
To start off, 1990 Ford Ranger is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Triumph Roadster. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Triumph Roadster would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Ford Ranger (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1950 Triumph Roadster. (71 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1950 Triumph Roadster.
Because 1990 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 Triumph Roadster. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Ford Ranger | 1950 Triumph Roadster | |
Make | Ford | Triumph |
Model | Ranger | Roadster |
Year Released | 1990 | 1950 |
Body Type | Pickup | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 2088 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 71 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4220 mm |