1990 Ford Ranger vs. 1960 Mazda R 360
To start off, 1990 Ford Ranger is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Ford Ranger (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1960 Mazda R 360. (16 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1960 Mazda R 360.
Because 1990 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Mazda R 360. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Ford Ranger | 1960 Mazda R 360 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Ranger | R 360 |
| Year Released | 1990 | 1960 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 355 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 16 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 2990 mm |
