1990 Ford Ranger vs. 1963 Pontiac Tempest
To start off, 1990 Ford Ranger is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Pontiac Tempest. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Pontiac Tempest would be higher. At 6,376 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Pontiac Tempest is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Pontiac Tempest (295 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 186 more horse power than 1990 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Pontiac Tempest should accelerate faster than 1990 Ford Ranger.
Because 1990 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Pontiac Tempest. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Ford Ranger | 1963 Pontiac Tempest | |
| Make | Ford | Pontiac |
| Model | Ranger | Tempest |
| Year Released | 1990 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 6376 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 295 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 5160 mm |
