1990 Ford Ranger vs. 1963 Renault 8
To start off, 1990 Ford Ranger is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Renault 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Renault 8 would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Ford Ranger (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1963 Renault 8. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1963 Renault 8.
Because 1990 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Renault 8. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Ford Ranger | 1963 Renault 8 | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Ranger | 8 |
Year Released | 1990 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 956 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4000 mm |