1990 Ford Ranger vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1990 Ford Ranger is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Ford Ranger (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Ford Ranger | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Ford | Triumph |
Model | Ranger | 2000 |
Year Released | 1990 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4420 mm |