1990 Ford Ranger vs. 1982 Kia Brisa
To start off, 1990 Ford Ranger is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Kia Brisa. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Kia Brisa would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Ford Ranger (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1982 Kia Brisa. (53 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1982 Kia Brisa.
Because 1990 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Kia Brisa. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Ford Ranger | 1982 Kia Brisa | |
| Make | Ford | Kia |
| Model | Ranger | Brisa |
| Year Released | 1990 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 985 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 3860 mm |
