1990 Ford Ranger vs. 1982 Mitsubishi Celeste
To start off, 1990 Ford Ranger is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mitsubishi Celeste. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mitsubishi Celeste would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1990 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Mitsubishi Celeste. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Ford Ranger | 1982 Mitsubishi Celeste | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Ranger | Celeste |
Year Released | 1990 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4160 mm |