1990 Ford Ranger vs. 1983 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 1990 Ford Ranger is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Ford Ranger (109 HP) has 39 more horse power than 1983 Nissan Pulsar. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1983 Nissan Pulsar.
Because 1990 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Nissan Pulsar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Ford Ranger | 1983 Nissan Pulsar | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Ranger | Pulsar |
Year Released | 1990 | 1983 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1486 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 70 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4140 mm |