1990 Ford Ranger vs. 2000 Lotus M250
To start off, 2000 Lotus M250 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Lotus M250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lotus M250 (176 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1990 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lotus M250 should accelerate faster than 1990 Ford Ranger.
Because 1990 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Lotus M250. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Ford Ranger | 2000 Lotus M250 | |
| Make | Ford | Lotus |
| Model | Ranger | M250 |
| Year Released | 1990 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 176 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 7800 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4150 mm |
