1990 Ford Ranger vs. 2004 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 3,801 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (190 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 1990 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1990 Ford Ranger.
Because 1990 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Ford Ranger | 2004 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Ranger | Mustang |
Year Released | 1990 | 2004 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 3801 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4660 mm |