1990 Ford Ranger vs. 2005 Pontiac Montana
To start off, 2005 Pontiac Montana is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Pontiac Montana is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Pontiac Montana (200 HP) has 91 more horse power than 1990 Ford Ranger. (109 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Pontiac Montana should accelerate faster than 1990 Ford Ranger.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2005 Pontiac Montana has automatic transmission and 1990 Ford Ranger has manual transmission. 1990 Ford Ranger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Pontiac Montana will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Ford Ranger | 2005 Pontiac Montana | |
| Make | Ford | Pontiac |
| Model | Ranger | Montana |
| Year Released | 1990 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 3491 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 200 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 5230 mm |
