1990 Ford Ranger vs. 2005 Renault Clio
To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,957 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Renault Clio (252 HP @ 7150 RPM) has 143 more horse power than 1990 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1990 Ford Ranger.
Because 1990 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Ford Ranger | 2005 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | Ranger | Clio |
| Year Released | 1990 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 2957 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 252 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 7150 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 3850 mm |
