1990 Ford RS 200 vs. 1948 Maserati A6GCS
To start off, 1990 Ford RS 200 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Maserati A6GCS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Maserati A6GCS would be higher. At 1,978 cc (6 cylinders), 1948 Maserati A6GCS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Ford RS 200 (250 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 1948 Maserati A6GCS. (129 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Ford RS 200 should accelerate faster than 1948 Maserati A6GCS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Ford RS 200 weights approximately 560 kg more than 1948 Maserati A6GCS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1990 Ford RS 200 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1948 Maserati A6GCS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Ford RS 200 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Ford RS 200 | 1948 Maserati A6GCS | |
| Make | Ford | Maserati |
| Model | RS 200 | A6GCS |
| Year Released | 1990 | 1948 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1798 cc | 1978 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 129 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 620 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2320 mm |
